Quable vs Akeneo
Head-to-head comparison based on PXM Atlas profiles verified 2026-10.
French SaaS PIM with DAM, brand portal and AI enrichment, part of the Ibexa group.
SaaS product information platform (Akeneo Product Cloud) with an open-source Community Edition and supplier and channel modules.
Quable is a PIM platform from Paris, France; Akeneo is a PIM platform from Nantes, France. Public evidence favours Quable on digital asset management, while Akeneo shows stronger evidence on supplier onboarding, gs1 gdsn connectivity, dpp and compliance data. Choose based on fit: European brands and manufacturers that want a SaaS PIM with DAM and a partner-facing brand portal, particularly those considering the Ibexa DXP.
Side-by-side
| Criterion | Quable | Akeneo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | PIM | PIM |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Nantes, France |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Ownership | Majority owned by Ibexa (part of QNTM Group, backed by Altor) since the deal announced in December 2024 | Private, venture and growth equity backed (investors include Summit Partners, Partech, Alven and Salesforce Ventures) |
| Deployment | SaaS | SaaS, Open source |
| Segments | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Pricing model | Subscription, quote based; pricing described as adapted to usage and growth objectives. | Subscription, quote based, structured as Product Cloud packages; Community Edition available free of charge under OSL 3.0. |
| Product information management | Core strength | Core strength |
| Digital asset management | Native capability | Basic or via partner |
| Channel syndication | Native capability | Native capability |
| Supplier onboarding | Basic or via partner | Native capability |
| Multi-domain MDM | No public evidence | No public evidence |
| AI content generation | Native capability | Native capability |
| Data quality and completeness | Native capability | Native capability |
| Workflow and governance | Native capability | Native capability |
| GS1 GDSN connectivity | No public evidence | Basic or via partner |
| DPP and compliance data | No public evidence | Basic or via partner |
Evidence levels follow the PXM Atlas methodology. Comparable on: product information management, channel syndication, multi-domain mdm, ai content generation, data quality and completeness, workflow and governance.
Where Quable stands out
- PIM, asset library, brand portal and print automation are offered as modules of one SaaS platform.
- Brand Portal supports sharing product content and marketing kits with retailers and distributors.
- Ownership by Ibexa gives a path to combined PIM and DXP deployments and shared AI agent technology.
Where Akeneo stands out
- Mature PIM core with a flexible attribute and family model and completeness scoring.
- Product Cloud modules for supplier onboarding (SDM) and channel activation from one vendor.
- Large partner network and app store, plus an open-source edition with a broad developer base.
Evaluate with Quable
- Several agentic AI features are announced for September 2026 to 2027, so availability should be confirmed contractually.
- No public information was found on GS1 GDSN or a DPP module, which matters for regulated or grocery categories.
- Pricing is described as usage and growth based without published figures.
Evaluate with Akeneo
- Capabilities differ by Product Cloud package, so scope and module licensing need confirming early.
- Native asset management is product-centric; organisations with large media libraries often add a dedicated DAM.
- GDSN publication and DPP generation rely on partners and connectors from the app store.
Questions
Is Quable or Akeneo better?
Neither is better in general. Quable fits best when: European brands and manufacturers that want a SaaS PIM with DAM and a partner-facing brand portal, particularly those considering the Ibexa DXP. Akeneo fits best when: Mid-market and enterprise brands, manufacturers and retailers that want a SaaS PIM with supplier onboarding and channel activation, supported by a partner ecosystem.
What is the main difference between Quable and Akeneo?
Quable is a PIM platform from Paris, France; Akeneo is a PIM platform from Nantes, France. Public evidence favours Quable on digital asset management, while Akeneo shows stronger evidence on supplier onboarding, gs1 gdsn connectivity, dpp and compliance data. Choose based on fit: European brands and manufacturers that want a SaaS PIM with DAM and a partner-facing brand portal, particularly those considering the Ibexa DXP.
Do Quable and Akeneo support compliance data such as the Digital Product Passport?
Quable: No specific public information on GS1 GDSN, DPP or PPWR support as of October 2026. Akeneo: Akeneo supports DPP projects through partner apps such as Ocode, which generates digital product passports from PIM data (partnership announced May 2024); GDSN exchange is available through third-party connectors.